1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses

Contact lenses for patients who have astigmatism

    1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM lenses combine two unique technologies in a daily disposable contact lens for astigmatism: Eyelid Stabilised Design for clear and stable vision all day1,2 and DUAL-ACTION LACREON that helps keep moisture in and irritation out3-8. Built with EYE-INSPIRED™ Design, ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses offer more than just vision correction.

    Pack of 30 lenses. 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses with LACREON® Technology and UV Blocking.

    ACUVUE® EYE-INSPIRED™ Design

    ACUVUE EYE-INSPIRED Design Offering more than just vision correction

    Discover the science and patented technologies that make ACUVUE® Brand Contact Lenses so special

    Find out more

    Lens Details

    1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses specifications

    Lens material etafilcon A
    Lens design Eyelid Stabilised Design
    Wetting technology LACREON® technology
    Water content 58%
    Base curve 8.5mm
    Diameter 14.5mm
    Power range

    Sphere:

    -6.50D to -9.00D (in 0.50 D steps)

    0.00D to -6.00D (in 0.25 D steps)

    +0.25D to +4.00D (in 0.25 D steps)

     

    Cylinders: 

    -0.75D, -1.25D, -1.75D, -2.25D*

     

    Axes: 

    10°-180° in 10° steps for 0.00D to -6.00D
    70°-110° and 160°,170°,180°, 10° , 20° for -6.50D to -9.00D and +0.25D to +4.00D

     

    *cylinder -2.25D available in power range 0.00D to -6.00D and axes 10°, 20°, 70°, 80°, 90°, 100°, 110°, 160°, 170°, 180°
    Centre thickness 0.090mm (-3.00D lens)
    Oxygen transmissibility (Dk/t)
    (boundary and edge corrected)5    		 23.7 x 10-9(-3.00D lens)
    Oxygen flux
    (% available to central cornea)6     		 88%
    Class 2 UV-blocking** 98.8% UVB, 85.1% UVA
    Visibility features Visibility tint
    Orientation marks Vertical single lines at 6 and 12 o’clock
    Recommended replacement schedule

    Single use: 1 day replacement
    Pack sizes available 30 lenses
    IFU (1,154.2 KB)

    ** All ACUVUE® Brand Contact Lenses have Class 1 or Class 2 UV-blocking to help provide protection against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye. UV-absorbing contact lenses are NOT substitutes for protective UV-absorbing eyewear such as UV-absorbing goggles or sunglasses because they do not completely cover the eye and surrounding area. UV transmission measured with -1.00 lens.

    * Oxygen transmissibility at centre of a -3.00D lens using boundary-corrected, edge-corrected Dk values. Units: (cm/sec) (ml O2/ml x mm Hg) at 35° C. Dk determined via polarographic method. 
    † Based on in vitro data; clinical studies have not been done directly linking differences in lysozyme profile with specific clinical benefits. 

    Packing solution contains boric acid and disodium tetraborate (sodium borate) to control the pH of the solution.

    1. Chamberlain P et al. Fluctuation In Visual Acuity During Soft Toric Contact Lens Wear. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 534–538. 
    2. McIlraith R, Young G, Hunt C. Toric lens orientation and visual acuity in non-standard conditions. CLAE 2010; 33 (1): 23–26. 
    3. Sheardown H et al. Chemical characterization of 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® and 1-DAY ACUVUE® contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47: E-Abstract 2388. 
    4. JJVC Data on file 2005 and 2007. 
    5. JJVC Data on file 2009. Post-hoc analysis October 2009. Among adults aged 25-34 (n=71) P<0.05. With 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®, 1% of patients experience frequent eye irritation, 14% of wearers occasionally experience eye irritation while 83% seldom or never experienced eye irritation. 
    6. JJVC Data on file 2011. 
    7. JJVC Data on file 2014. Data generated in collaboration with the Centre for Contact Lens Research (CCLR) in Waterloo, Canada. Based on in vitro data; clinical studies have not been done directly linking differences in lysozyme profile with specific clinical benefits. 
    8. Suwala M et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138–143.
    9. JJVC data on file 2012
    10. Sulley A, Young G, Osborn Lorenz K, et al. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33,94-103. 
    11. Sheardown H et al. Chemical characterization of 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® and 1-DAY ACUVUE® Contact Lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: E-Abstract 2388. 
    12. JJVC Data on file 2005. 
    13. JJVC Data on file 2007. 
    14. JJVC Data on file 2009. Post-hoc analysis October 2009. Among adults aged 25–34 (n=71) P<0.05. With 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®, 1% of patients experience frequent eye irritation, 14% of wearers occasionally experience eye irritation while 83% seldom or never experienced eye irritation.
    15. JJVC Data on file 2011.
    16. JJVC Data on file 2014. Data generated in collaboration with the Centre for Contact Lens Research (CCLR) in Waterloo, Canada. 
    17. Suwala M et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens, 2007; 33, 138–143.
    18. Veys J & French K. Health Benefits of Daily Disposable Lenses. Optician 2006; 231:6050;16-20. 
    19. Chalmers RL, Hickson-Curran SB, Keay L, Gleason WJ, Albright R. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large post market surveillance registry: the TEMPO registry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:654–663. DOI:10.1167/ iovs.14-15582 
    20. Hayes V et al. An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers. CLAE, 2003; 26:2, 85–93.
    21. Morgan P, Brennan N, et al. Central & peripheral Dk/t thresholds to avoid corneal swelling during open eye soft CL Wear. Appl Biomater 92B:361-365, 2010. 
    22. Holden B, Mertz G. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal oedema for DW & EW CLs. IOVS. 1984; 25(10):1161-7. 
    23. Percentage available to central cornea (open eye); compared to 100% with no lens; Brennan NA. Beyond flux: Total corneal oxygen consumption as an index of corneal oxygenation during contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82(6):467-72

    Benefits

    1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses Key Features and Benefits

     

    Clear, stable vision for astigmats thanks to Accelerated Stabilisation Design™ (ASD).

    Clear, stable vision for astigmats

    • The unique Eyelid Stabilised Design technology in 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM delivers clear and stable vision regardless of head or eye movement1,2
    • STABILISES in 60 seconds9
    • 93% FIRST-FIT success10

    Wide coverage

    • 94% of patients can be accommodated with a wide range of parameters11

     

     

    1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses with LACREON® technology for added moisture.

    MOISTURE IN

    • Unique LACREON® technology creates a cushion of moisture that lasts all day12.13.14

     

    IRRITATION OUT†

    • Unique flexible material that fits comfortably to your patients’ eyes15
    • Keeps lysozyme in its natural state16,17†

     

     

    1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM Contact Lenses have Class 2 UV-blocking to protect against harmful UV rays.

    High UV-blocking**

    • 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses provide Class 2 UV protection, which blocks 98.8% UVB and 85.1% UVA rays,* helping to protect your patients' eyes against harmful UV radiation all year round
    • Ideal for patients who enjoy outdoor activities and sports

     

     

     

    The freedom and convenience of fresh, new contact lenses every day

    • Daily disposables are the healthiest way to wear contact lenses18,19
    • Ideal for allergy sufferers20
    • No cleaning required
    Download 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM package insert (585.7 KB)

    ** All ACUVUE® Brand Contact Lenses have Class 1 or Class 2 UV-blocking to help provide protection against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye. UV-absorbing contact lenses are NOT substitutes for protective UV-absorbing eyewear such as UV-absorbing goggles or sunglasses because they do not completely cover the eye and surrounding area. UV transmission measured with -1.00 lens.

    * Oxygen transmissibility at centre of a -3.00D lens using boundary-corrected, edge-corrected Dk values. Units: (cm/sec) (ml O2/ml x mm Hg) at 35° C. Dk determined via polarographic method. 
    † Based on in vitro data; clinical studies have not been done directly linking differences in lysozyme profile with specific clinical benefits. 

    Packing solution contains boric acid and disodium tetraborate (sodium borate) to control the pH of the solution.

    1. Chamberlain P et al. Fluctuation In Visual Acuity During Soft Toric Contact Lens Wear. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 534–538. 
    2. McIlraith R, Young G, Hunt C. Toric lens orientation and visual acuity in non-standard conditions. CLAE 2010; 33 (1): 23–26. 
    3. Sheardown H et al. Chemical characterization of 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® and 1-DAY ACUVUE® contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47: E-Abstract 2388. 
    4. JJVC Data on file 2005 and 2007. 
    5. JJVC Data on file 2009. Post-hoc analysis October 2009. Among adults aged 25-34 (n=71) P<0.05. With 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®, 1% of patients experience frequent eye irritation, 14% of wearers occasionally experience eye irritation while 83% seldom or never experienced eye irritation. 
    6. JJVC Data on file 2011. 
    7. JJVC Data on file 2014. Data generated in collaboration with the Centre for Contact Lens Research (CCLR) in Waterloo, Canada. Based on in vitro data; clinical studies have not been done directly linking differences in lysozyme profile with specific clinical benefits. 
    8. Suwala M et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138–143.
    9. JJVC data on file 2012
    10. Sulley A, Young G, Osborn Lorenz K, et al. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33,94-103. 
    11. Sheardown H et al. Chemical characterization of 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® and 1-DAY ACUVUE® Contact Lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: E-Abstract 2388. 
    12. JJVC Data on file 2005. 
    13. JJVC Data on file 2007. 
    14. JJVC Data on file 2009. Post-hoc analysis October 2009. Among adults aged 25–34 (n=71) P<0.05. With 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®, 1% of patients experience frequent eye irritation, 14% of wearers occasionally experience eye irritation while 83% seldom or never experienced eye irritation.
    15. JJVC Data on file 2011.
    16. JJVC Data on file 2014. Data generated in collaboration with the Centre for Contact Lens Research (CCLR) in Waterloo, Canada. 
    17. Suwala M et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens, 2007; 33, 138–143.
    18. Veys J & French K. Health Benefits of Daily Disposable Lenses. Optician 2006; 231:6050;16-20. 
    19. Chalmers RL, Hickson-Curran SB, Keay L, Gleason WJ, Albright R. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large post market surveillance registry: the TEMPO registry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:654–663. DOI:10.1167/ iovs.14-15582 
    20. Hayes V et al. An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers. CLAE, 2003; 26:2, 85–93.
    21. Morgan P, Brennan N, et al. Central & peripheral Dk/t thresholds to avoid corneal swelling during open eye soft CL Wear. Appl Biomater 92B:361-365, 2010. 
    22. Holden B, Mertz G. Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal oedema for DW & EW CLs. IOVS. 1984; 25(10):1161-7. 
    23. Percentage available to central cornea (open eye); compared to 100% with no lens; Brennan NA. Beyond flux: Total corneal oxygen consumption as an index of corneal oxygenation during contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;82(6):467-72